<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">REA Press</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">20</journal-id>
      <journal-title>REA Press</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">3042-0210</issn><issn pub-type="epub">3042-0210</issn><publisher>
      	<publisher-name>REA Press</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22105/aaa.v2i2.67</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group><subject>Time series, Deep learning, LSTM, GRU, ARIMAX</subject></subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Intelligent Stock Price Prediction Using LSTM, GRU, ARIMA, and ARIMAX Models: Analysis and Performance Comparison</article-title><subtitle>Intelligent Stock Price Prediction Using LSTM, GRU, ARIMA, and ARIMAX Models: Analysis and Performance Comparison</subtitle></title-group>
      <contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Amiri</surname>
		<given-names>Seyyedeh Bita </given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Computer Science, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran.</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Amidian</surname>
		<given-names>Arefeh </given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Computer Science, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran.</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Fasihfar</surname>
		<given-names>Zohre </given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Computer Science, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran.</aff>
	</contrib></contrib-group>		
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>27</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>2</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2025 REA Press</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</p></license>
      </permissions>
      <related-article related-article-type="companion" vol="2" page="e235" id="RA1" ext-link-type="pmc">
			<article-title>Intelligent Stock Price Prediction Using LSTM, GRU, ARIMA, and ARIMAX Models: Analysis and Performance Comparison</article-title>
      </related-article>
	  <abstract abstract-type="toc">
		<p>
			This study examines and compares the performance of four-time series forecasting models, including ARIMA, ARIMAX, LSTM, and GRU, in forecasting the stock price of Iran Export Bank over 16 years (2009-2025). The data were prepared for modeling after performing preprocessing steps such as normalization. In the modeling section, the classical ARIMA models and the improved version of ARIMAX, which also consider exogenous variables (such as trading volume, moving average, and volatility), were used along with deep learning-based Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), namely LSTM and GRU. The results showed that the deep learning models LSTM and GRU performed significantly better than the classical models. Among the classical models, ARIMAX performed significantly better in forecasting than ARIMA, which had very poor performance. The LSTM model provided the most accurate forecasts and was able to model more than 98.67 percent of the data changes. The GRU model also performed close to LSTM, approximately 98.61, but its accuracy was slightly lower than LSTM. The results show that deep learning models, especially LSTM, perform better than classical models in simulating nonlinear patterns and long-term dependencies in financial data. Overall, deep learning-based models, especially LSTM, are powerful tools for predicting complex time series and can play an important role in investment decisions and analyzing stock market trends.
		</p>
		</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body></body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <p>nunn</p>
    </ack>
  </back>
</article>